The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an cute little “playful character”. Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a sizeable but guardian-like friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a heart of gold.
A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canada-based amusement park have been entangled in a disagreement between a closed attraction, government authorities and animal rights activists.
But those closest to the whales say the heated debate over their fate often ignores the complexities of the whales who, after spending their lives in captivity, have been closely studied by the caretakers who see them each day.
After the federal government prevented the sale of the belugas to China, the controversial amusement park near the famous falls where they are held stated it would consider to put them down unless the government pays for the cost of their care. Canada’s fisheries minister has denied that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious circumstance.
Scientists say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their vocal imitation skills, cognitive challenges and group interactions suggest they are remarkably smart mammals – something a former trainer observed personally.
Burgess spent three years as a beluga trainer, a job that required earning the trust of the sea creatures.
“Developing those relationships over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of love. At the beginning, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so wonderful and gratifying.”
Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so surprised by the nuances and unique traits in their dispositions. She formed a particular love for a pair of whales with contrasting personalities.
“Eve chose me. The other required effort,” she said. “Each transformed the way I perceive connection.”
Burgess’s relationship with the whales developed against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their captivity.
During her three years at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s single killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In all, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the facility ascribes to natural mortality, but which campaigners say points to the substandard environment in which they were housed.
The facility did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but the former trainer says she saw with her own eyes consequences of the cessation. “Concrete is deteriorating from the pools because they’re in disrepair and not being repaired. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and move about with fragments in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”
The park did not comment to a request for comment, but previously stated: “The whales … obtain far higher quality veterinary services and constant supervision than any individual in the Britain, or anywhere else.”
The former employee was dismissed from the facility in early March following the passing of a beluga, an sick beluga the caretakers had to humanely kill. She said the facility suspected details of the death were leaked to the news outlets and she was fired not long after.
The uncertainty over the whales’ future has left Burgess and other caretakers in anguish. She says the park’s ultimatum to end the lives of its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” task, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a individual beluga would require “significant personnel”, vehicles and machinery.
“It’s impossible in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess supports demands for the whales to be removed immediately from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.
In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister rejected a request to send the whales to an overseas location.
“Allowing the application would have meant a ongoing existence in captivity and a reversion to display for amusement,” the official stated. “As Canadians, we know that belugas should be in the wild, not in tanks for our enjoyment. I could not in clear conscience authorize an transfer that would prolong the situation these belugas have experienced.”
But Burgess said the official’s comments indicate a wider incorrect perception of the realities of life for belugas born in captivity.
“The society needs to grasp these are whales that have lived entirely in enclosed habitats and they will need constant supervision for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘shut it down’.”
As decision makers work to find a solution, ideas have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. An idea called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a important part of sustenance for Indigenous peoples.
A proposed refuge in the province of Nova Scotia, which now received regulatory clearance, has shown to be contentious. The prospective site, which includes a large area of protected cove, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain hopeful that it could in time represent a permanent solution for some of the whales.
But, Burgess says, among staff she’s spoken with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.
Some experts say the idea of a sanctuary indicates a worldwide trend away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a viable approach in the coming months.
Charles Vinick, leader of the initiative, said the site will simulate the mental engagement and diet the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the medical condition of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|
Maya is a tech journalist and digital strategist with over a decade of experience covering emerging technologies and their impact on society.